When I was in school at the Scripps School of Journalism at Ohio University (I say this, because I used to be a journalist-in-training), we learned to corroborate sources of information to make sure we were being told the truth as journalists.
If only people had that ability ingrained in their brains–check and verify what you are told is the truth, it would be a lot harder for the government to snow us with propaganda. Fortunately, the internet is a good source of news information; however, it’s also a good source of echo chambers from every political bent that parrot what their ideologues want people to hear. It saddened me to read this in Sunday’s New York Times online.
Of course, we as civilians are told to rely on retired military experts to explain military procedure and war planning, because that’s not our job. We’ve all seen Col. Ken Allard, Gen. Wayne Downing and other brass touting what the Pentagon and military are doing in their missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
What they forgot to mention is that they are specifically tailoring their ‘expert personal opinions’ to mirror what the Pentagon wants them to say, as opposed to the truth on the ground.
Go on and read the article. It’s long, so you might want to pack a lunch for it. I’ll wait…
…..
Back already? Awesome. Do you own stock in Nortel Government Solutions? How about Northrop Grumman? Have you ever heard of Patton Boggs, or McNeil Technologies? Let me help out here. Retired Air Force General Thomas McInerney sits on the board of Nortel Government Solutions and serves as an analyst for Fox News. Coincidence? Ret. General James Marks, of the Army, is a senior executive at McNeil Technologies, which is a lobbying firm for defense contractors. He was also a war analyst for CNN from 2004-2007. How about that?
Do you see the picture now? After calls of prisoner abuse at Guantanamo Bay in 2005 and word of the insurgency in 2004, the Pentagon dispatched Generals Marks and McInerney to the networks to talk about all of the positives at Guantanamo. They helped downplay the insurgency, even when it was at its worst. For their good work, they were paid $500-$1000 per “hit” or appearance on TV. They also had their foot in the door for securing business for their friends in the military industrial complex.
The Pentagon said to them, basically, if you want to hang out at our bar, you’d better tell your mother you’re at the library studying.
Over time, the Pentagon recruited more than 75 retired officers, although some participated only briefly or sporadically. The largest contingent was affiliated with Fox News, followed by NBC and CNN, the other networks with 24-hour cable outlets. But analysts from CBS and ABC were included, too. Some recruits, though not on any network payroll, were influential in other ways — either because they were sought out by radio hosts, or because they often published op-ed articles or were quoted in magazines, Web sites and newspapers. At least nine of them have written op-ed articles for The Times.
So basically, the news reporters weren’t telling America the truth, because the media would rather take the word of bought and paid for officers. That’s what it boils down to. It’s all about the Benjamins when it comes to informing the nation.
Now, I understand the need to keep America positively focused after the reaction the nation took to Vietnam. Still, give us as Americans some credit! We can handle the truth about how the war is going. Should we have to go to BBC.com to get the real scoop on what’s happening on the ground in Iraq? Does America need to be psy-oped like we’re the enemy? Apparently, that’s the case.
This was a major theme, for example, with Paul E. Vallely, a Fox News analyst from 2001 to 2007. A retired Army general who had specialized in psychological warfare, Mr. Vallely co-authored a paper in 1980 that accused American news organizations of failing to defend the nation from “enemy” propaganda during Vietnam.
“We lost the war — not because we were outfought, but because we were out Psyoped,” he wrote. He urged a radically new approach to psychological operations in future wars — taking aim at not just foreign adversaries but domestic audiences, too. He called his approach “MindWar” — using network TV and radio to “strengthen our national will to victory.”
Just reading that last sentence makes me think of the sounds of jackbooting troops on parade and the strains of “Deutschland Uber Alles.” Are you kidding me? I never thought I’d see the day, where America would be taking pages of Joseph Goebbel’s propaganda playbook.